Skip to main content

Montie 3; Disentangling the entangled


The first thing that occurred to me when I first saw Elikplim Agbemava 2020 posters is his motive for filing the constitutional case against the pardon granted to the Montie 3.

That question is coming up now but with an interesting twist; Elikplim Agbemava is being accused of conniving with Executive Secretary to the President Nana Asante Bediatuo to attempt get the Montie 3 jailed again.

Whiles, I note that Elikplim Agbemava has publicly responded to the “connivance” allegation, I would like to contribute to the debate by sharing portions of an article I wrote on this same subject matter in my article titled; Bediatuo's disinterest; Dotse's advice and vanishing Attorney.


The first case was one filed by Elikplim Lorlormavor Agbemava challenging the scope of the constitutionally conferred power to pardon of the President of Ghana.

He sent the case after concerns emerged about the decision of former President John Mahama to remit the sentences three gentlemen who have become known as the Montie 3.

The three gentlemen were jailed four months each by a Supreme Court panel presided over by the current Chief Justice Sophia Akuffo.

The three, a former colleague Mugabe Maase, NDC communicator Godwin Ako Gunn and the ever passionate Alistair Tairo Nelson were found liable of Contempt of court for comments made on radio.

Even though the sentence at the time was widely criticized as harsh, the decision of former President John Mahama to cut short their sentence with a remission received more than mixed reactions.

The remission became a political bullet that the opposition deployed in what turned out to be a successful assassination of former President Mahama’s second term ambition.

Despite the criticism, the issue of whether the former Ghanaian leader exercised his power to pardon capriciously was left to a public referendum.

Lawyer Elikplim Agbemava, left a lot of persons in awe with his decision to carrying the debate into the Supreme Court by filing a case challenging the decision to pardon the Montie 3 holding the view that the then President exceeded his powers.

Before I move on, I would like to issue a disclaimer; nothing about his reliefs demanded that the 3 jailed men return to jail.

That claim was made by the man who is currently the President’s Executive Secretary, Nana Asante Bediatuo.

Nana had managed to successfully hijack Elikplim’s suit by filing a similar suit and getting it much wider press coverage.

So the modest case that Elikplim filed became the case of Nana Asante Bediatuo seeking to get the Supreme Court to order the Montie 3 to return to jail even though none of the suits made any such demand and such an order from the court would be excessive.

Fast forward to March 20, 2018, the case is yet to make a single progress more than a year after the case was filed.

This is largely due to the feet dragging of Nana Asante Bediatuo and the AG; perhaps because Nana has lost interest in a case that may trim the powers taken up by his namesake due to the magic of the 2016 elections.

So for more than a year, I have followed as the three parties involved made little progress in deciding on the issues the Supreme Court should rule; leaving Elikplim frustrated in addition to being rendered an outsider in a case he originally instituted.

Until March 20, it felt like Elikplim was the only one frustrated with the case; I can report that the Judges are not enthused.

The Presiding Judge, Justice Sophia Adinyira made it a case to remind the media men in the courtroom that it is the party’s that are delaying the case and asked the media to report that.

This is refreshing especially after she ordered that the issues stage be concluded by March 28, 2018; so we continue to wait.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...

SC to determine fate of "unexecuted" but "ratified" US-Ghana agreement

Barely three days after its ratification under controversial circumstances, the Defense Cooperation agreement between the Governments of the United States and Ghana is facing its first constitutional test. The agreement is the subject is a suit filed by Ashanti Regional Youth organizer of the National Democratic Congress Yaw Brogya Gyamfi. The government led by the Minister of Defence Dominic Nittiwul successfully pushed the agreement through parliament with the overwhelming support of all New patriotic Party MPs despite concerns over its constitutionality. The Minority led by its leader Haruna Iddrisu had questioned the suitability of the agreement for a parliamentary approval because it has not been duly signed and therefore does not meet the constitutional requirement of execution in order for it to be ratified. Article 75(2) which gives Parliament the authority to ratify agreements entered into by the executive reads; A treaty, agreement or convention executed by...

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges. It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue. Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges. Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states; “The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.” This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time. Information I have gathered indicates  some judges ar...