Skip to main content

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges.
It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue.
Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges.
Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states;
“The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.”
This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time.
Information I have gathered indicates  some judges are stewing in anger over the imposition of 35 percent on persons earning 10,000 cedis and above.
The move has gravely affected the salaries of most judges with some of them considering suing government over the move because they believe it violates Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution which regulates their conditions of service.
My sources tell me the tax measure has significantly eroded the salaries of Justices of the Superior Courts.
In some cases, the measure has wiped off over 2000 cedis from the take home pays of the judges, a variation that the Justices say is a disadvantage to them.
The Justices, I understand expected government to at least sit down with the judiciary to discuss the impact of the tax measure on them and putting in place mitigating measures before going ahead to implement them.
It is unclear whether the Judicial Service would take up the matter with the government with the assumption of the legal year but information available is that some judges
are seriously considering dragging government to the Supreme Court.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Volivo Bridge: Mahama's unfinished business and cost of delay

In the 2025 Mid-Year Budget Review, Finance Minister Dr Cassiel Ato Forson declared, "We aim to ensure that all the priority projects are completed and commissioned by the end of 2028." Number one on that list was the construction of a new bridge across the Volta River at Volivo. The priority projects in question are ones for which funding had been secured but had neither been completed nor started before Ghana defaulted on the payments of its debts and began moves to restructure these debts in 2022. "Mr Speaker, following Ghana’s default on its external debt service obligation on 19 December 2022, creditors halted disbursements of 55 bilateral projects. This resulted in several uncompleted projects scattered across the country and left a massive amount of US$3 billion in undisbursed loans," Cassiel Ato Forson clarified in the Mid-Year Budget Review. In the wake of an agreement being reached with its official creditors on debts owed, there was the need t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Splitting VR; AG backs "prejudicial enquiry"

The Attorney General is seeking an early end to application for the hearing of Commission of enquiry for the creation of new regions to be extended to the Southern Volta. The application was filed by Chief of Srogboe Torgbi Kpatamia IV and 5 others for the court to compel the Commission to hold the hearings on whether a new region should be carved out of the present Volta region after their concerns over the siting of venues for the hearing of were dismissed. According to the applicants, the siting of the venues is prejudicial because they are remote from some parts of the Volta region and so would not afford the residents of those parts, the opportunity to be heard. However, the AG represented by Jonathan Acquah thinks the application does not deserve to be heard and hence moved a preliminary legal objection on March 20, 2018 for the matter to be dismissed before it is even heard. The move would be double jeopardy for the applicants whose letter asking the AG to int...
1 comment
Read more