Skip to main content

Teachers confused, as meetings on controversial "insurance" end inconclusive

Every journalist likes a good story but some stories are so interesting they must be told.

One of those stories is about attempts by local representatives of teacher unions to explain what is turning out to be an interesting topic, "Special insurance for teachers"

The story is told of how most teachers woke up one morning, walked to their banks (which are usually GCB Bank),to their surprise found out GHC10 had been deducted form their salaries and it was going to be monthly affair; the purpose for these deductions, life insurance cover for them.

It turned out their respective unions had signed them on for these insurance covers, in the belief that it was in the interest of the teacher. Unfortunately for the unions, no teacher is a juvenile so you need their consent to sign them up to anything no matter how well intentioned.

So the roars went up in the various classrooms with some teachers resorting to social media to express their disgust at the move leaving union leaders hot and trying to justify their actions. Their justification, we agreed but had not given government the greenlight because we had not consulted the teachers.

To save face, the unions added their voices to that of the members and demanded a suspension to the deductions; government yielded and suspended the deduction.

This meant only one thing, the unions had to now go and speak to their members about the insurance policy and so they got to work.

It has not been an easy task, at least from what my friend teacher told me. Local union representatives are having to close meetings on the policy with the pledge to return with answers to basic questions.

The union representatives are going to the teachers with one clear message; he/she who is not interested should opt out. Funny, you thought? Exactly the thought of the teachers who are surprised they are being asked to opt out of something they never opted in. 

They are supposed to now go to the offices of the Accountant General with one message; opt me out of a policy I never signed onto. Interesting approach, isn't it? That is the situation the teachers are confronted with. 
My friend told me, it seemed that was the only thing their local representative knew and was supposed to tell them. According to my friend, when they feigned interest in the policy and started asking questions about documentation, maturity and collection, the union representative could not provide answers. 

So the Ministry of Education and the Ghana Education Service, I have been told to ask one question; how does the insurance policy work?

The two outfits can also consider opting every teacher out and then going to the ground to explain the policy for interested teachers to opt in.

Until then, my friend teacher wants the money back. Refund please!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...

SC to determine fate of "unexecuted" but "ratified" US-Ghana agreement

Barely three days after its ratification under controversial circumstances, the Defense Cooperation agreement between the Governments of the United States and Ghana is facing its first constitutional test. The agreement is the subject is a suit filed by Ashanti Regional Youth organizer of the National Democratic Congress Yaw Brogya Gyamfi. The government led by the Minister of Defence Dominic Nittiwul successfully pushed the agreement through parliament with the overwhelming support of all New patriotic Party MPs despite concerns over its constitutionality. The Minority led by its leader Haruna Iddrisu had questioned the suitability of the agreement for a parliamentary approval because it has not been duly signed and therefore does not meet the constitutional requirement of execution in order for it to be ratified. Article 75(2) which gives Parliament the authority to ratify agreements entered into by the executive reads; A treaty, agreement or convention executed by...

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges. It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue. Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges. Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states; “The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.” This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time. Information I have gathered indicates  some judges ar...