Skip to main content

COCOBOD fertilizer case; Opuni demands documents


Embattled former Chief Executive of the Ghana COCOBOD has filed an application in court seeking documentation relating to facts that the Republic would be relying on in the case against him.

Dr. Stephen Opuni has been charged with 27 counts of various criminal offences relating to lithovit foliar fertilizer supply contracts covering three cocoa planting seasons awarded to indigenous company, Agricult Ghana Limited.

The other parties in the matter are Agricult and its Managing Director Seidu Agongo.

Even though the matters being tried by the court relates to actions taken by Dr. Opuni as COCOBOD CEO, he has indicated that he does not have copies of the documents in question and therefore wants the court to order the Attorney General to give him copies.

Dr. Opuni in the application said the documents are crucial to his defence against the charges because his lawyers would be making copious references to them.

The documents relates firstly to claims by the Attorney General that Dr. Opuni whiles serving as COCOBOD CEO instructed or directed officials of a subsidiary of COCOBOD Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG) to shorten the period for testing the said Lithovit Foliar fertilizer.

The other document the former COCOBOD CEO is applying for are letters he is alleged by the AG to have written to the Public Procurement Authority on the 19th and 24th February and the 10th December 2014 and the 16th October 2015 purportedly misleading the authority to grant approval for sole sourcing of the fertilizer in question.

Dr. Opuni also wants copies of the report of the February 2017 probe that indicted him on the matter and recommended criminal investigation of the said allegations that have become the subject matter of the court case.

Aside these documents, Dr. Opuni is also asking the court to direct the AG to supply him with copies witness statements of persons interviewed as part of the probe and those the state intends to call as prosecution witnesses and defence witnesses of Seidu Agongo and Agricult.

The former COCOBOD CEO believes the documents in question would help him in the preparation of his defence.

Dr. Opuni is relying on the same constitutional provision that has led to the invocation of the Supreme Court’s power to interprete and enforce the constitution in the case against a former Board Chair of the National Communication Authority and four others.

He believes the provisions of Article 19(2)(e)&(g) of the 1992 constitution entitles him to the documents he is applying for.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...

SC to determine fate of "unexecuted" but "ratified" US-Ghana agreement

Barely three days after its ratification under controversial circumstances, the Defense Cooperation agreement between the Governments of the United States and Ghana is facing its first constitutional test. The agreement is the subject is a suit filed by Ashanti Regional Youth organizer of the National Democratic Congress Yaw Brogya Gyamfi. The government led by the Minister of Defence Dominic Nittiwul successfully pushed the agreement through parliament with the overwhelming support of all New patriotic Party MPs despite concerns over its constitutionality. The Minority led by its leader Haruna Iddrisu had questioned the suitability of the agreement for a parliamentary approval because it has not been duly signed and therefore does not meet the constitutional requirement of execution in order for it to be ratified. Article 75(2) which gives Parliament the authority to ratify agreements entered into by the executive reads; A treaty, agreement or convention executed by...

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges. It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue. Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges. Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states; “The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.” This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time. Information I have gathered indicates  some judges ar...