Skip to main content

Still in prison; walking the streets

No matter how hard I try to convince myself that it won't happen, reading through the agreed issues to be determined in the case against the remission of sentence granted the Montie 3 only deepens my fear and expands my doubts.

Over the past months, I have had to answer the question as to whether the three can be returned to jail; my answer has always been a definite "No."

That "No" is perhaps now, a "Maybe" because the Supreme Court can of cause grant what it deems proper and in consonance with the law.

The difficulty is that the Montie 3 are but observers of a constitutional battle which may restrict the meaning of conviction to exclude those jailed for contempt.

Three different persons, one of whom is Executive Secretary to the President Nana Asante Bediatuo are of the opinion that former President Mahama exceeded his mandate when as a serving Ghanaian leader he granted a remission of sentence to the Montie 3.

The Montie 3 had been convicted and sentenced to three months in prison for Contempt of Court for comments made against a panel of the highest court of our land.

This decision by a Supreme Court panel presided over by the current Chief Justice Sophia Akufo in 2016 led to protests and calls for remission.

One of the very first calls came from outspoken US based Ghanaian law professor Kwaku Asare popularly called Kwaku Azar, a known opponent of Ghana's contempt of court laws.

After weeks of protests during which listeners to the famous "Pampaso" program and very high profile political personalities picketed the premises of Network broadcasting.

Their  demand, simple; exercise your powers  of pardon and free the Montie 3.

These protesters felt the Supreme had with its decision lifted and hurled the proverbial sledgehammer at remorseful flies.

Angry as they were, they soon realized that picketing great as it was not enough to trigger the President's power to pardon.

So signatures, some heavier than the pen were collected to submit the petition that assembles "old heads" to advice a grey hair to mercy.

Having been advised, the Ghanaian leader John Mahama at the time granted not pardon but a remission that cut short the undesirable dungeon holiday.

Welcomed as remorseful heroes who would learn not to step on the feet that drew the dizzy slap, the three men soon learnt their minds never left the cells of Nsawam

Their new torment is an assemblage of learned men they can only observe as three lawyers Elikplim Lorlormavor Agbemava, Alfred Tua Yeboah and Nana Asante Bediatuo argue against the remission of sentence.

Their case; simple i.e. former President abuse his powers of pardon and remission because it does not cover Contempt of Court.

For all involved especially the three, the wait involved has been eternal as apostles of the new leader took their time to take a stance; afterall It, one of their own is against what they are now forced to defend.

One thing remained constant, the contemnors never really left Nsawam; in fact they clearly feel they are on borrowed time.

A few weeks ago, one of them received a call that was clearly misinformed informing him that a bench warrant has been issued for their arrest; a painful reminder that he still serves a sentence long remitted.

So, the Montie 3 (by the way I forgot Montie FM has been buried in a Tsunami) would keep watch to find out from the gatemen what the Lords would decide.

Having said that, allow me to share with you the agreed issues to be determined by the Supreme Court in this Constitutional matter that directly attacks the Montie 3

Whether or not the exercise of discretionary power of the President in favour of the contemnors was arbitrary and capricious.

Whether or not the grant of remission of the  sentence of the contemnors by the President constitute an unjustified interference with the judiciary and an affront to constitution.

Whether or not the grant of remission of sentence by the President to the contemnors constitute an abuse of the President's discretion.

I remain a gatekeeper who learns but yearns for an end to this long watch and hope to provide the worried the response they seek.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...

SC to determine fate of "unexecuted" but "ratified" US-Ghana agreement

Barely three days after its ratification under controversial circumstances, the Defense Cooperation agreement between the Governments of the United States and Ghana is facing its first constitutional test. The agreement is the subject is a suit filed by Ashanti Regional Youth organizer of the National Democratic Congress Yaw Brogya Gyamfi. The government led by the Minister of Defence Dominic Nittiwul successfully pushed the agreement through parliament with the overwhelming support of all New patriotic Party MPs despite concerns over its constitutionality. The Minority led by its leader Haruna Iddrisu had questioned the suitability of the agreement for a parliamentary approval because it has not been duly signed and therefore does not meet the constitutional requirement of execution in order for it to be ratified. Article 75(2) which gives Parliament the authority to ratify agreements entered into by the executive reads; A treaty, agreement or convention executed by...

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges. It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue. Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges. Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states; “The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.” This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time. Information I have gathered indicates  some judges ar...