Accra High Court Judge today expressed his surprise at the
failure of the Attorney General to hide its bias and vindictiveness towards local
mining company Exton Cubic.
This is after he found that contents of one of the documents filed
by the Attorney General were everything but helpful to the case he was supposed
to determine.
Exton Cubic filed the certiorari application after the Minister
for Lands and Natural Resources wrote a highly publicized letter on September 4,
2017 invoking three separate mining leases granted to the wholly Ghanaian owned
company.
Exton Cubic in the application challenged the Lands Minister’s
power to invalidate the licenses without first seeking the recommendation of
the Minerals Commission and giving the lease holders a hearing.
Delivering a very eventful decision on the application today,
the Presiding Judge Justice Ackaah-Boafo expressed his unhappiness with contents
of a supplementary affidavit filed by the Attorney General.
Lawyers for Exton Cubic had first raised concerns about the
said affidavit describing its contents as political and offensive.
They subsequently challenged the admissibility of the said
document because it failed to raise any reasonable legal grounds.
Commenting on the issue the Justice Kweku Ackaah-Boafo said
the document contained “emotive innuendos and not facts.”
He said the contents of the said supplementary affidavits exposed
the government to suggestion that the cancellation of the leases was an act of
vindictiveness.
The Judge also kicked against the AG’s suggestion that Exton
Cubic should not have listed the Minister for Lands and Natural Resources as
the Respondent in the matter.
The AG argued that she should have been named as Respondent
but Justice Ackaah-Boafo said that would have been incongruent because the act
being challenged was carried out by the Lands Minister and not the AG.
He described the AG’s suggestion as misconceived.
The High Court Judge also dismissed the claim that the Exton
Cubic should have employed arbitration in resolving the disagreement with the State.
The AG argued that Section 27 of Act 703 mandated the mining
company to first try to resolve the issue by employing Alternative Dispute
Resolution.
Justice Ackaah Boafo however held that the AG’s position was
flawed because she had already pleaded that Exton Cubic had no mineral right.
He said the provision in question only applied to a mineral
right holder and that the AG cannot in breath claim the company had no right
and in another breath ask the company to employ a procedure reserved for a
right holder.
The Judge held that the right forum to hear the matter was
the High Court.
Justice Ackaah Boafo ruled that the minister had no power to
revoke the leases held by the company in such manner no matter what his
intentions are.
Comments
Post a Comment