Skip to main content

Martin Amidu sued; too old to occupy SP Office


This is either a calculated blow or a timeous coincident because with just a few hours to his vetting for the position of Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu’s suitability for the job is being challenged by Member of parliament for Bolgatanga East Dr. Dominic Ayine.

The legislator’s basis is that Mr. Amidu is too old to fill the position he has been nominated for.
Mr. Amidu is 66 years old but Dr. Ayine believes the age limit for a position like that of the Special Prosecutor is 65.

The Bolga East MP’s position is contained in suit filed on his behalf by his lawyer Tony Lithur.
Dr. Ayine in the suit argues that 190(1)(d), 199(4) and 295 of the 1992 Constitution puts the retirement age at 60 with room for an extra 5 years.

According to him, a careful reading of the constitutional provisions in question means no person in public office can occupy it beyond 65 years.

The Bolga East MP also argues that the appointment of Mr. Amidu is inconsistent with Section 13 (3) of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2018 (Act 959).

Martin Amidu is scheduled to appear before Parliament’s Appointment Committee tomorrow but Dr. Ayine in suit says the nomination and consequent Parliamentary approval that may be granted to the former Attorney General would be unconstitutional, null and void.

The Bolga East MP who is also a former deputy Attorney General is pushing for any Parliamentary approval or Presidential appointment that may be granted to Mr. Amidu before the suit filed at the Supreme Court is determined.

The suit at the Supreme Court is for the chosen panel to decide “whether or not on a true and proper interpretation of Aricles 190(1)(d), 199(4) and 295 of the 1992 Constitution, 2nd Defendant (Mr. Amidu) having already attained the age of Sixty-six (66) years as at 6th September 2017, is qualified or eligible to be nominated by the Attorney General, appointed by the President and approved by parliament to serve in the public services generally, and, specifically, as the Special Prosecutor under Section 13(3) of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2018 (Act 959).”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sandy and Gibeleen's task; Improving sickle cell care

Two sisters Sandy Ayivor and Gibeleen Amponsah Ninpong are hoping to change the face of sickle cell care in the country within five years. This they hope to do through their GNS (Gibeleen & Sandy) Foundation. Ghana’s foremost sickle cell clinic is a one block facility comparable to the ones used as clinics in villages. The most worrying aspect is that the same facility is supposed to be the Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics. The Institute is supposed to be the leading center for diagnosis and care for persons suffering from genetic conditions or ones inherited. Even though the Institute has some of the best brains in clinical genetics running and working in the facility, they have been reduced to providing only sickle cell care. A former Director of the Institute Dr. Edeghonghon Olayemi says the GNS Foundation first contacted the clinic and demanded to know the challenges of the company. He revealed that a list of the challenges confronting the ...

SC to determine fate of "unexecuted" but "ratified" US-Ghana agreement

Barely three days after its ratification under controversial circumstances, the Defense Cooperation agreement between the Governments of the United States and Ghana is facing its first constitutional test. The agreement is the subject is a suit filed by Ashanti Regional Youth organizer of the National Democratic Congress Yaw Brogya Gyamfi. The government led by the Minister of Defence Dominic Nittiwul successfully pushed the agreement through parliament with the overwhelming support of all New patriotic Party MPs despite concerns over its constitutionality. The Minority led by its leader Haruna Iddrisu had questioned the suitability of the agreement for a parliamentary approval because it has not been duly signed and therefore does not meet the constitutional requirement of execution in order for it to be ratified. Article 75(2) which gives Parliament the authority to ratify agreements entered into by the executive reads; A treaty, agreement or convention executed by...

Anger; new income tax measure takes toll on Judges salary

Anger is brewing in the judiciary over the impact of mid-year tax measures on the salaries of judges. It would be recalled that government announced a 35 percent tax on persons earning over 10,000 cedis as part of measures to rake in more revenue. Even though the move has been hailed as forward looking, Gold News understands it is affecting the living conditions of judges. Article 127(5) of the 1992 Constitution states; “The salary, allowances, privileges and rights in respect of leave of absence, gratuity, pension and other conditions of service of a Justice of the superior court or any judicial officer or other person exercising judicial power, shall not be varied to his disadvantage.” This constitutional provision, I am made to understand imposes an obligation on government to ensure that its policies do not unduly negatively affect the living conditions of judges but that seems not to be the case at this time. Information I have gathered indicates  some judges ar...